IN a contentious move, Gambia’s parliament received a bill on Monday seeking to repeal the country’s ban on female genital mutilation (FGM), sparking heated debates among lawmakers and the public. The bill, presented by lawmaker Almameh Gibba, challenges the ban imposed by former president Yahya Jammeh in 2015, which introduced severe penalties for perpetrators of the practice.
Gibba’s bill argues that the ban infringes on citizens’ rights to practice their cultural and religious traditions, with many Gambians still viewing FGM as a requirement of Islam. The proposed repeal has ignited passionate discussions about the delicate balance between cultural practices and human rights.
‘The current ban violates our rights to practice our culture and religion,’ Gibba emphasised, echoing sentiments shared by supporters of the bill.
However, the proposal has divided public opinion, drawing sharp criticism from anti-FGM advocates who warn of the detrimental physical and psychological effects of the practice on girls and women. ‘A lifting of the ban would be a huge step back,’ stated one advocate, reflecting concerns shared by many.
Highlighting the health risks associated with FGM, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has underscored that the practice offers no medical benefits and can lead to severe medical complications. Despite this evidence, proponents of the bill argue for the preservation of cultural traditions and religious beliefs.
‘The bill has sparked intense debates, with strong arguments on both sides,’ remarked a parliamentary spokesperson, acknowledging the complexity of the issue.
The upcoming second reading of the bill, scheduled for March 18, is expected to further fuel discussions and deliberations among lawmakers. As Gambia grapples with the prospect of repealing the FGM ban, stakeholders remain divided on the best approach to safeguarding both cultural practices and the well-being of girls and women.