Keypoints:
- Top courts shut on petition deadline
- Mundubile races to challenge election result
- Observer findings question official vote totals
ZAMBIAN authorities shut the country’s highest courts on Monday as opposition leader Brian Mundubile raced against a constitutional deadline to challenge President-elect Hakainde Hichilema’s disputed re-election, intensifying scrutiny of Zambia’s democratic institutions after a contentious presidential vote.
The confrontation has now moved beyond competing claims about the August 13 election result. At stake is whether the opposition is being given a meaningful opportunity to use the constitutional process specifically designed to resolve disputes over the presidency.
Courts shut as deadline looms
Reuters reported that the Supreme Court premises in Lusaka, which also house the Constitutional Court, were closed on August 24, with all gates closed and police officers visible inside.
A memorandum from the chief administrator of the judiciary instructed staff not to report for work ‘for security reasons’.
The timing is politically sensitive.
Under Article 103 of Zambia’s Constitution, a person seeking to challenge the election of a President-elect has seven days from the declaration to petition the Constitutional Court.
Hichilema was declared President-elect in the early hours of August 18 after the Electoral Commission announced that he had secured about 60 percent of the presidential vote, compared with about 38 percent for Mundubile.
That leaves the opposition facing a deadline running into the early hours of Tuesday.
Police spokesman Godfrey Chilabi told Reuters that security assessments were continuing but declined to provide details. The judiciary could not immediately be reached for an explanation of what arrangements, if any, had been made for urgent election-related filings.
By Monday afternoon on August 24, the opposition was still trying to lodge the petition, according to Reuters.
The closure follows an election process that was already disrupted by violence and the temporary suspension of counting. Africa Briefing reported how Zambia halted vote counting after violence and ballot theft as tensions escalated during the tabulation process.
Physical access blocked
The closure clearly prevented physical access to the court complex at a crucial moment in the electoral dispute.
What remains unclear is whether the judiciary offered any alternative procedure that would allow the opposition to submit its petition before the constitutional deadline.
That distinction matters.
The closure itself does not establish that authorities deliberately prevented Mundubile from challenging the result. But the absence of clear public guidance over how an urgent presidential petition could be lodged raises questions about access to the legal process.
New Heritage Party President Chishala Kateka, whose party belongs to Mundubile’s opposition alliance, told Reuters that the group was still trying to get the case before the court.
‘We are trying our best to ensure that the petition is filed but we will see how it goes,’ she said.
Mundubile announced last week that he intended to ask the Constitutional Court to overturn the presidential result, alleging serious irregularities.
Africa Briefing has previously examined the allegations and legal stakes in Zambia’s looming presidential election challenge.
Observer findings raise questions
Independent monitoring has added weight to concerns over the accuracy of the official figures while stopping short of concluding that Mundubile won the election.
The Christian Churches Monitoring Group, an independent domestic observer coalition, estimated through its Process and Results Verification for Transparency exercise that Hichilema received 56.0 percent of the vote, plus or minus 1.7 percentage points.
It estimated Mundubile’s share at 42.3 percent, also plus or minus 1.7 points.
CCMG said the official totals for both candidates fell outside those estimated ranges and found that votes had been added in 30 constituencies, artificially increasing turnout.
But its conclusion was equally significant: the discrepancies did not change the overall presidential outcome.
CCMG said its estimates still showed Hichilema receiving the most votes and clearing the 50 percent threshold required to win without a run-off.
The findings therefore raise questions about the accuracy of parts of the official tally without supporting a conclusion that Mundubile was the rightful winner.
EU flags tabulation failures
The European Union Election Observation Mission has separately raised concerns about what happened after voting.
It said the conduct of results tabulation ‘deteriorated significantly’ after the Electoral Commission suspended counting nationwide for six hours on August 14 following violence and reports of ballot theft.
EU observers documented procedural failures, extended unexplained breaks and a heavy military presence at some totalling centres.
The mission said the military presence was described as intimidating by people it interviewed and coincided with a decline in the number of party agents and citizen observers present.
The EU later said serious incidents and procedural irregularities during counting and tabulation had affected the transparency and credibility of the process.
At the same time, observers have not concluded that Hichilema lost the election or that nationwide voting was fraudulent.
That distinction remains central to any credible assessment of Mundubile’s challenge.
Pressure grows around opposition
The court closure comes amid wider pressure on Mundubile and people associated with his campaign.
Several opposition figures were detained following a security operation after the election, while police summoned Mundubile for questioning over alleged threats to national security.
The opposition leader says the allegations are fabricated.
Africa Briefing has reported on the competing accounts surrounding the operation and arrests in the deepening Mundubile security dispute.
Hichilema’s United Party for National Development has maintained that Mundubile remains free to use the legal avenues available to him.
That position is now facing a practical test.
Court battle could reshape transition
If the petition is successfully filed, Article 103 requires the Constitutional Court to hear and determine the case within 14 days.
The court can either declare Hichilema’s election valid or nullify the election of the President-elect and Vice-President-elect. Its decision is final.
The dispute carries implications well beyond Mundubile’s allegations.
Hichilema won power in 2021 after defeating an incumbent president, reinforcing Zambia’s reputation for competitive elections and peaceful transfers of power. His administration has also promoted the country internationally as an example of democratic stability alongside its economic recovery from sovereign default.
Before the election, Africa Briefing examined how the vote was testing Hichilema’s economic recovery record against continuing frustration over living costs.
The question now is whether Zambia’s institutions can demonstrate that a disputed result can also be tested openly and peacefully through the courts.
If Mundubile files, the country’s political battle shifts firmly into the Constitutional Court.
If he does not, scrutiny will focus on whether his alliance simply failed to meet the deadline — or whether Monday’s court closure materially restricted its ability to exercise its constitutional right.
Related stories
