Keypoints:
- DFC has committed $62.8m across four countries
- Private investors remain wary of rare-earth projects
- Africa faces a crucial test over local value capture
THE United States is stepping deeper into Africa’s rare-earth sector, committing public money to projects that private investors remain reluctant to finance as Washington races to reduce its dependence on China for minerals vital to advanced industry and national security.
Reuters reported on August 19 that the US International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) has committed $62.8m to rare-earth projects in Malawi, Angola, Madagascar and South Africa. None of the projects has yet entered production, highlighting the gap between geopolitical ambition and commercial reality.
The financing points to a fundamental challenge facing Washington. Africa possesses potentially important sources of rare earths, but strategic importance alone has not been enough to persuade conventional investors to accept the technical, financial and market risks involved.
US public money fills the gap
The largest share of DFC’s African rare-earth exposure is linked to South Africa’s Phalaborwa Rare Earths Project.
Reuters says about $50m of the agency’s commitments is tied to Phalaborwa. DFC and company documents describe the financing as a proposed equity investment or funding option through strategic investor TechMet, rather than money that has necessarily already been fully disbursed.
Phalaborwa is being developed by Rainbow Rare Earths, with TechMet among its strategic shareholders. The project plans to recover rare-earth elements from historic phosphogypsum waste created by previous phosphate-mining operations, rather than establishing a conventional new mine.
DFC documents put the project’s overall funding requirement at about $317m, illustrating the scale of capital needed even after government-backed financing has helped reduce early-stage risk.
Africa Briefing has previously examined how Washington maintained its backing for South Africa’s rare-earth ambitions despite broader strains in relations with Pretoria, signalling the growing strategic importance attached to critical minerals.
The investment is particularly significant because DFC executives have openly acknowledged the reluctance of private capital.
One senior executive told Reuters that the agency was trying to move projects to a more de-risked stage where commercial investors might eventually be willing to participate.
Private financiers remain concerned about project risk, uncertain returns and the possibility that Chinese intervention in rare-earth markets could weaken prices and undermine project economics.
China still shapes the economics
That concern goes to the heart of Washington’s challenge.
China remains overwhelmingly dominant in rare-earth refining and downstream supply chains, giving Beijing enormous influence over markets that feed electric vehicles, wind turbines, electronics and sophisticated defence systems.
The International Energy Agency says China accounts for more than 90 percent of global rare-earth refining supply, underlining how difficult it will be for Western-backed projects to build alternative supply chains quickly.
Beijing has also tightened export controls on a range of strategic materials in recent years, reinforcing concerns in Washington and other Western capitals about dependence on Chinese processing capacity.
For African projects, this dominance creates a difficult commercial equation.
A deposit can be geologically attractive and strategically important while still struggling to compete against established Chinese mining, processing and manufacturing networks that have been built over decades.
Reuters cited Olimpia Pilch, head of strategy at Critical Minerals Africa, as warning that there are more announced rare-earth projects than current demand can support in some parts of the magnet market, particularly for neodymium-praseodymium.
That helps explain why government-backed capital is moving ahead of private investors.
Madagascar shows Washington’s strategy
Madagascar provides another example of how Washington is attempting to close the financing gap.
DFC has committed up to $4.84m towards early development work at the Ampasindava rare-earth project, including pilot-plant activity, laboratory testing and environmental programmes.
The development is expected to cost roughly $150m, with developer Harena Rare Earths targeting production around mid-2028.
Ampasindava is expected to produce rare-earth elements including neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium and terbium, all of which are important for permanent magnets used in industrial, clean-energy and defence applications.
As Africa Briefing reported on Washington’s backing for the Madagascar project, one of the key unresolved questions is where those minerals will ultimately be processed.
Harena has been assessing refining options in the US and Europe.
That issue may prove as important for African economies as who finances extraction.
Africa’s prize is processing, not extraction
The global competition for critical minerals gives African governments greater bargaining power, but the long-term economic prize lies in capturing more of the value chain.
Extracting minerals or producing concentrates generates economic activity. Separation, refining, component manufacturing and industrial production, however, can create a much broader ecosystem of technology, skilled employment and domestic supply chains.
That distinction is already influencing policy across the continent.
Kenya and the US have been discussing a critical-minerals agreement that would emphasise local processing, reflecting a wider African push to move beyond the historic model of exporting raw resources while higher-value manufacturing takes place elsewhere.
Africa Briefing has previously examined how Kenya is pushing local mineral processing higher up the agenda, while the continent’s growing leverage in the global minerals race increasingly depends on whether governments can turn strategic demand into industrial capacity.
The IEA expects rare-earth demand to continue growing strongly through 2040, reinforcing the strategic case for diversifying supply.
But diversification will require far more than new mines or recovery projects. It will also require separation plants, refining capacity, long-term offtake agreements and manufacturing investment.
The real test is production
For Washington, the immediate challenge is turning strategically attractive projects into commercially operating rare-earth production and processing facilities.
DFC’s African rare-earth portfolio remains small compared with the capital required to create an alternative supply chain capable of competing with China.
The agency’s executives told Reuters that Africa represents roughly 20 percent to 25 percent of DFC’s worldwide investment portfolio, underlining the continent’s broader importance to US development and strategic financing.
Yet the rare-earth projects cited by Reuters remain pre-production.
That makes the $62.8m commitment less a declaration of victory over China than an acknowledgement of how difficult diversification will be.
Washington can absorb risks that private investors currently will not, finance feasibility work and help projects reach construction. What it cannot do through public finance alone is reproduce the processing networks, industrial scale and market influence that China has accumulated over decades.
For Africa, the emerging competition nevertheless creates an opportunity.
If governments can turn geopolitical demand into investment in processing, technology, infrastructure and local manufacturing, the rare-earth race could support a different development model.
If not, the continent risks becoming strategically indispensable while remaining concentrated at the lowest-value end of another global commodity chain.
Related stories
