Keypoints
- SA detention bid pushed into 2027
- Adetshina says authorities unfairly targeted her
- High Court review holds deportation key
SOUTH Africa’s bid to detain former Miss South Africa finalist Chidimma Adetshina while pursuing her deportation has stalled after a Cape Town court delayed its decision until 2027, leaving her free as she challenges Home Affairs over her legal status.
The setback marks a dramatic new phase in a controversy that began during the 2024 Miss South Africa competition. What started as a dispute over Adetshina’s nationality has become a legal battle involving citizenship, immigration enforcement, due process and South Africa’s increasingly heated debate over migration.
Court fight pushed into 2027
The Cape Town Regional Court postponed its decision until February 27, 2027, saying it could not determine whether Adetshina should be detained pending deportation until the High Court has ruled on her review application.
Adetshina has approached the High Court to challenge the Department of Home Affairs’ decision to deport her.
For now, the 25-year-old remains free but must stay at the same address and report regularly to an immigration officer while the legal proceedings continue.
The ruling effectively prevents Home Affairs from immediately securing her detention as it pursues removal from the country.
Adetshina says she was targeted
Speaking after the hearing, Adetshina insisted that she had been ‘treated unfairly and targeted’ by South African authorities.
She said there had been an attempt to make an example of her and stressed that she was born in South Africa and was using established legal channels to have her status determined.
‘I remind everyone that I was born in South Africa,’ she said, adding that her citizenship and status should be determined through the law rather than public pressure.
Adetshina also warned that ‘xenophobia and misinformation’ should not determine how people are treated.
Her remarks came as anti-migrant protesters gathered outside the Cape Town court demanding that she be deported.
Members of March and March and Operation Dudula protested against the postponement, underlining how a dispute that once centred on a beauty pageant has become entangled with South Africa’s wider immigration politics.
Home Affairs presses its case
Home Affairs maintains that Adetshina does not have valid legal status in South Africa and wants her deported.
She was arrested in June after authorities accused her of unlawfully returning to South Africa. She was later released on a warning while the detention and deportation proceedings continued.
Adetshina disputes the government’s position and argues that South Africa is the country where she was born and raised.
Her lawyers have also challenged the attempt to detain her while the legality of the Home Affairs decision itself remains before the High Court.
The current case follows the government investigation that began after questions about her nationality exploded during the 2024 Miss South Africa competition.
Africa Briefing reported at the time that Adetshina withdrew from Miss South Africa amid concerns for her family’s safety after Home Affairs said preliminary investigations suggested her mother may have been involved in identity fraud.
Home Affairs stressed then that Adetshina could not have participated in any alleged wrongdoing because she was an infant at the time.
Pageant row becomes legal showdown
After withdrawing from Miss South Africa, Adetshina accepted an invitation to compete in Nigeria and went on to win Miss Universe Nigeria.
Africa Briefing subsequently reported that South African authorities withdrew her identity and travel documents as the dispute over her legal status intensified.
She later represented Nigeria at Miss Universe in Mexico, finishing as first runner-up and being named Miss Universe Africa and Oceania.
Her performance prompted fresh debate over nationality and belonging, with Africa Briefing reporting how her Miss Universe success revived arguments over her South African and Nigerian identities.
But being born in South Africa does not by itself automatically settle the citizenship question.
South African government guidance says a person born in the country automatically qualifies for citizenship where at least one parent is a South African citizen or permanent-residence permit holder. Other routes to citizenship can also apply depending on individual circumstances.
That legal distinction now sits at the heart of Adetshina’s fight.
Xenophobia enters the courtroom
The demonstrations outside court have also given the case a broader political dimension.
Adetshina has repeatedly linked the hostility directed at her to xenophobia, while groups campaigning against undocumented migration insist their objections concern immigration law rather than her Nigerian or Mozambican family background.
The distinction is important.
Whether Adetshina is legally entitled to remain in South Africa is ultimately a question for the courts and immigration authorities. The hostility surrounding her nationality, however, has been part of the controversy since she first emerged as a Miss South Africa finalist.
What happens next?
Attention now shifts to the High Court, where Adetshina is challenging the Home Affairs decision underpinning the deportation process.
Until that review is resolved, the Regional Court has indicated it cannot settle the question of whether she should be detained pending deportation.
That means Adetshina remains free for now — and ensures that a nationality controversy born on the beauty-pageant stage will remain before South Africa’s courts well into 2027.
Related stories
